160 Meters


(These are miscellaneous hodgepodge notes about the 160 meter band, from different posts I have made on qrz.com, eham.net, the Topband mailing list, and direct email. Someday I will organize this and create a decent web page about 160 meters.)
Bookmark and Share

Which is the best 160m antenna ?

From W8JI on qrz.com:

"The fact is....... an Inverted L with 20 or more radials at least 50 feet and hopefully 100 feet long will absolutely smoke any normal height loop antenna or dipole antenna at nearly any distance on 160 meters. The possible exception is between 20 and 200 miles.

As a matter of fact a low full wave loop has no gain, any horizontal wire has increased earth induced loss as it is made longer when close to earth.

Do not make the radials shorter just because you have fewer radials. They really need to be as straight and long as possible, but lengths over 100 feet don't help much. Even 20-30 radials 60 feet long make a fairly good ground.

Nearly all especially successful stations on 160 use a vertically polarized antenna of some type for transmitting. That's just a fact.

I have a full size 160 dipole at 300 feet, and it is never really much better than a 1/4 wave vertical at any distance in any direction. As a matter of fact, the dipole is 10-20 dB weaker than the vertical off the dipole ends. The dipole only beats the vertical broadside to the dipole, and then only rarely!! And this is with the dipole 300 feet above ground.

73 Tom"


http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=260716&highlight=beverage


The EZNEC plot below (courtesy of E74AW) shows that you don't need a full-size 1/4 wave vertical to be effective.
Patterns are shown for antennas 12, 16, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 meters tall. All have 60 radials, 40 meters long.

Pattern vs. antenna height comparison


------------------------------------

160 is the only band I currently operate, using CW around 1825. It's a great band, and it's not called the "Gentleman's Band" for nothing. You will find that a vertical with a good radial system will work well for DXing while using a separate RX antenna such as a Beverage or a K9AY loop.


--------------------------------

W8JI: "A vertically polarized antenna with a good ground system will work much better than any horizontal antenna. An Inverted L is one of the best ways to make a good transmitting signal, so long as you have a good ground system.

For receiving, a Beverage is simple and easy and very good. If you do not have the room for a beverage, then some small loops will help. Look at K9AY and Flag antennas.

If you cannot have much height, a dipole would be as good or better than an extended zepp or big horizontal loop. Nothing will be as good as an Inverted L or another good vertical for transmitting."

-------------------------------

Unless you want to work only stations very close to you, use a 1/4 wave vertical, an inverted L, or a T antenna with about 60 1/4 wave radials. Use a separate antenna for receiving.

I think if you talk to the people who operate 160, you'll find out that few (if any) of them use a low dipole on that band. Most are using verticals or inverted L antennas. They require a modest radial ground system of about 35 radials 50 feet long. And many use separate antennas for receiving; those with the room use Beverage antennas (or phased short verticals), and those with smaller lots use K9AY loops or similar antennas.

Look at what they use on the AM broadcast band. Without exception, they all use verticals (with an extensive radial system). No AM radio station uses dipoles, horizontal loops, etc.


That's probably an oversimplification, but unless the folks you want to talk to are fairly close, you do really need a low angle of radiation on that band. A dipole is fine on 80 meters on up, but on 160, that's usually not the case.
------------------------------

03-27-2010, W0BTU
Originally Posted by KJ4TIR

Q: I realize that talking on HF depends on a number of factors but in your experience, how far have you been able to reach someone on 160 meters? If you were in my posistion, the foothills of South Carolina, how far do you think I could reach?

A: Adam,
I've been on 160 since January 30, and I've worked 28 countries with a wire thrown over a tree (and two elevated radials). I listen using Beverage rx antennas. I've worked Australia and New Zealand, quite a distance from here. Others have done far better than me.

-----------------------------------

I should warn you about something, though. ;-) If you operate 160 meters much, you may get the Topband Disease.

Perhaps I should now explain the symptoms of the disease. They are as follows:


If these symptoms persist for more than one sunspot cycle (every 11 years), then you should strongly suspect TopBand disease.
More info at http://n6tr.jzap.com/tbdisease.html

----------------------------------

You would appreciate the 4th edition of Low Band DXing by ON4UN, John Devoldere, even if you're not interested in working DX.


W0BTU Beverage receiving antennas

This page is a work in progress. As we find the time (and motivation), it will be improved. Thanks for visiting.

 Home

Copyright © 2011 Comtech Research LLC. All Rights Reserved.

  http://www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html - Last Edited March 21, 2011

 

Locations of visitors to this page since 11-15-2010